On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:31:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> writes: > > > Besides being a bug in the GR to formulate way too much how the > > implementation goes, looking at the actual text of what we voted on, it > > always says "the initial policy is ...". That point had been discussed > > in various places and the usual outcome was "Yeah, can change it due to > > that". As long as the functionality is given, which is. Technically > > even better than before. > > I was definitely reading it wrong. That certainly resolves all of my > (unimportant) concern. Sorry about the noise!
Do not be sorry. I find it very important that the concern was raised and answered to satisfaction in this bug report. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121002122348.GA31722@yellowpig
