Le Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:22:08AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes: > > > In the meantime, I propose to modify Appendix G by adding the following > > sentence. > > > Do not attempt to divert a conffile, as <prog>dpkg</prog> does not > > handle > > it well. > > > I know that we should not add contents to the appendices, but in that > > case it already contains a similar warning about files vitally important > > for the systemm, and I think that it would be confusing to separate the > > two warnings. > > This sounds okay for the time being, although it sounds like we may be > able to drop some of those warnings before too long.
Thanks for the feedback. I will commit this as a non-normative solution in the absence of comments in the next few days. Then, when dpkg will be corrected, we can remove this warning and the ones in other sections. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130325233856.gb1...@falafel.plessy.net
