]] Aurelien Jarno > How can we progress on this bug? We now have bugs #720777, #720778 and > #720780 which ask for /usr/lib<qual> to be created if /lib<qual> exists. > It's something that can be implemented, but before doing so, I would > like to know if a decision has been taken wrt the policy.
I think the whole lib<qual> thing should be avoided and we should nack it for any new ports. Ideally, we should also try to get ourselves out of the hole we've dug ourselves into. I don't see anybody being against relaxing the requirement for /usr/local/lib<qual> to exist, so we're presumably blocked on more seconds. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87tx90927p....@xoog.err.no
