>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> writes:
Charles> Le Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:27:53AM -0400, Sam Hartman a Charles> écrit : >> Hi. I've been debating how to respond to the shall vs must >> thing. The short answer is that there are reasons why you might >> prefer shall, but I find that I'd rather say "must is good >> enough," than try and come up with an articulate presentation of >> the energy which would conclude by saying that if must still >> seemed like the right choice go with it. >> >> So, I'm fine with s/shall/must. Charles> Thanks Sam, Charles> the word "shall" appears only once in the Policy (quoted Charles> below), so I think that avoiding it is consistent with the Charles> Policy's style. Nod, I think it was clear from your first message that this was your argument. I agree it's a valid position someone could take.