Addressing just this aside: Agustin Henze <[email protected]> writes:
> Thanks for that :), anyway it'd be good accepting MR on salsa and having > the discussion there. But it's a matter of team preferences of course. Both the BTS and Salsa are workable, both communication paradigms are used successfully by other projects, and both have their pluses and minuses. I don't really care which we use, but I do care a lot that we only use one of them. I'm more worried about splitting discussions and causing confusion by having one half of the discussion miss the other half of the discussion than about the details of the UI in those two options. It probably makes sense to lean towards using the BTS and email in the absence of strong feelings in favor of Salsa just because the broader communication culture of the project is very email-centric and it allows easy movement of discussions between debian-devel, Policy and the BTS, dpkg maintenance discussions, the Technical Committee, and so forth. I admit that it would be rather nice to have the discussion tied directly to patches against Policy in a mergeable form, though, rather than sometimes awkwardly sending around diffs. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
