control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Simon,
On Thu 04 Aug 2016 at 01:43PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> Other options >> ============= > ... >> * Add a real (non-virtual) empty package dbus-session-bus built by src:dbus, >> with Depends: dbus-user-session | dbus-x11 (initially). Other packages >> depend on dbus-session-bus. >> (Pro: simpler dependency graph. Con: requires NEW queue.) > > Another advantage of this option (which it shares with the others that do not > use a default-d-s-b virtual package) is that it avoids ambiguity if apt > is configured to see more than one suite (perhaps unstable and testing, or > testing and stable-security) and the package providing default-d-s-b differs > between those suites. > > If the scheme involving two virtual packages is preferred over this > option, I would very much appreciate someone who knows about these things > describing why, because it isn't currently clear to me. I note that no such binary package exists right now. Does this issue remain unresolved? I also note recent discussion on d-devel. Kindly update this bug with the present state of play. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
