Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> writes: > >> - No package for a 64 bit architecture may install files in >> - ``/usr/lib64/`` or in a subdirectory of it. >> + Packages must not install files in ``/usr/lib64`` or in a subdirectory >> + of it. > > This seems to be a semantic change, generalising the requirement to all > packages?
Well, I think you're both right. A lawyerly reading of policy might say 32 bit packages can install in /usr/lib64, but wouldn't that just be nonsensical, and maybe contradict other wording about FHS conformance
