On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:42 PM Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 01:34:44PM -0500, David Steele wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:15 PM Bill Allombert <ballo...@debian.org> > wrote: > > > > > Do you envision to have packages depending on todo and then use the > > > todo binary ? > > > > > > > No. This is a means to allow topydo and todotxt-cli to use "todo" without > > crowding devtodo. I believe this meets the definition of a virtual > package > > in the Policy. > > I am not use I understand. Do you plan for /usr/bin/todo to be managed by > update-alternatives ? That would require all alternatives to share a common > interface. > The guidance in the Policy is that alternatives "offer more-or-less the same functionality". I believe this standard is met.
