Package: debian-policy Version: 4.6.1.0 Severity: important Dear Maintainer,
I will like to stress that this kind of stuff is bad: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/isa-support/-/blob/master/debian/altivec- support.preinst.in#L10 base64 encoded binary in maint script and mktemp on /usr/lib I have no idea about documentating why it is bad. But for the sake of history we must learn of mistake, and document it Bastien -- System Information: Debian Release: bookworm/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 5.18.0-2-rt-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled debian-policy depends on no packages. Versions of packages debian-policy recommends: ii libjs-sphinxdoc 4.5.0-4 Versions of packages debian-policy suggests: pn doc-base <none> -- no debconf information