>>>>> "Luca" == Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> writes:
>> I consider this proposal to be premature. Policy should document Luca> current >> practice, and I do not think this proposal does that. For what it's worth, I agree with Luca that we are ready for a change to document that service units need to be included now, and I do not think a change in this area is premature. I have not (and probably will not get around to) reviewing the specific text, but I do think it's time for this change now. (Some of Simon's comments about the security implications of not being able to depend on systemd for dbus service activation but instead still needing to support dbus-daemon launching things itself make me think we should consider even more sweeping changes soon.)