>>>>> "Helmut" == Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> writes:


    Helmut> Questions: 1. Do you agree that policy should be changed?
    Yes.
    The TC has effectively set policy here already, and while they did
    not  use their power under 6.1.1 to actually officially set project
    policy, their position has been clear.
    

    Helmut>  If yes:

    Helmut>  2. Do you agree that policy should prohibit installing into
    Helmut> aliased paths?

Yes.

3.
    
    Helmut> Do you agree that the current progress is
    Helmut> sufficient for changing policy? If not, when can we change
    Helmut> policy?

I am not sure I agree with this question, but I agree with a simpler
question: should we change policy now.

    Helmut> 4. Do you agree with the proposed wording? Can you
    Helmut> suggest improvements?

I have no objections to the wording.

    Helmut> 5. Given earlier disagreement on this
    Helmut> matter, should we discuss this matter in a wider setting
    Helmut> such as d-devel?

No, please no!
If there ends up being disagreement, the TC should use its policy making
powers and put this to bed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to