On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 02:30:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 12:50:08PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > > > i just downloaded the vim source package, and will try building it. I > > suppose > > the binutrils package in experimental is : > > > > binutils_2.9.5.0.10-0.1_powerpc.deb, somewhat older than the current > > binutils. > > Will apt not complain about this and try to upload the package everytime i > > run > > it ? Is the vim bug a binutils bug also ? > > I beg your pardon? That's the newest binutils available, except for > the unpackaged .11 (through .13 now?).
Sorry, my confusion (i read 2.9.1.0.10) ... and the above mentioned vim bug came from some older X 3.9.x libraries i had lying around in the ldconfig path, and built with older binutils i guess. Friendly, Sven LUTHER
