> I did try kernel-image packages; I found that kernel-patch worked much > better. I've rewritten its rules almost from scratch. If you really > want to stick with kernel-image, I suppose that's OK, but there's no
I don't like dependencies, and kernel-patch is one extra to build the images. The kernel-image packages is from the method the same as for i386 and alpha. Without the dependencies we must not play with debhelper, kernel-package and other possible buggy packages. > real reason to have our own full kernel source in the archive when a No, the kernel-image package is only debian/* with patches, the source comes from Xu (the kernel-source-xxxxx.bz2). > That's why I didn't upload them. You haven't been around much, and I > desperately needed 2.2.14 kernels. I were on vacation the last week. > Console-data may be taken care of. Joey Hess was working on it all of > Monday. I'm seeing right now if it builds. Ok, i saw the upload and it works for me. Regards, Hartmut