On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Sven wrote: > Is it really just coincidence, or is dist-upgrade doing something particular > that reiserfs don't like ? Or maybe it is just that it is the only app that > really is very disk intensive, unpacking files, replacing files, etc, ...
It may just be broken (again). I remember a friend of mine trying the ReiserFS code that was in the 2.4.1 kernel, and the unlink() syscall code in the ReiserFS code caused an Oops reliably. So I wouldn't be surprised if it was just plain broken. As others have suggested, try Ext3, or XFS, or maybe JFS. JFS was kinda broken for awhile, but presently works well, and the endianness issues seem to have been worked out awhile back, so it might be worth a shot. I have the 1.0.5 code in my 2.4.9 kernel on my x86 system, and should probably see about switching back toward it on my G3 tower at work. (and maybe the iBook I've been playing with too...) Derrik Pates | Sysadmin, Douglas School | #linuxOS on EFnet [EMAIL PROTECTED] | District (dsdk12.net) | #linuxOS on OPN
