On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 23:55, Toby Sargeant wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:37:53AM +0200, Michel D?nzer wrote: > > Hardly, the example XF86Config and all my XF86Configs show a similar > > discrepancy (79.815 vs. 79.816) but work fine. > > All I can say is that on this machine, (TiBook 800MHz, 1024x854) the > difference *was* important.
But what was the 'hard way', what happened with the wrong dotclock? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]