On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 19:27, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 06:33:29PM +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > nope. pbbuttonsd does not work very well with pmud (hangs/settings not > > restored after wakeup). and as it fully replace pmud it should actually > > replace it. > > Do you mean Replace as a debian/control field? > If it really fully replace pmud (I haven't yet checked the doc ...) I > agree with tou: is better than conflicting.
hmmhh.. I only thought about making it conflict with pmud as it won't work correctly when both daemons are running. But indeed it does all the stuff pmud does (and a lot more)... but I am not sure whether replacing as in debian/control is the right thing to do... *I* would probably only make it conflict... Soeren