On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 02:28:02AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: > Sven, > > It's 2:15 AM, and I've got a meeting tomorrow at work, so I won't > be able to test these tonight. I'll try to get to them tomorrow > (9/1) in the evening (US East Coast time). > > Please do me a favor and loop-mount the images to see if they have > all the expected pieces and the pieces are of the expected sizes. > That way we won't loose another round of debugging for a problem > that doesn't require an actual bootstrap to discover. Thanks!
Ok : > >On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:15:01PM +0200, Wouter Hanegraaff wrote: > >>On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > >>>Please try the (2.6) floppies at : > >>> > >>>http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.6-2004.08.31 > >> > >>boot.img only contains vmlinuz and doesn't boot, ofonlyboot.img starts > >>loading a kernel and ends with the tux/red cross. Indeed : floppy-2.6-2004.08.31/ofonlyboot.img : Finder System zImage floppy-2.6-2004.08.31/boot.img: vmlinuz > >>>http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.4-2004.08.31 > >> > >>boot.img and ofonlyboot.img start loading a kernel and end with the > >>tux/red cross. Both of these are ok now. > >>>http://people.debian.org/~luther/miboot/floppy-2.4-old-2004.08.31 > >> > >>boot.img only contains vmlinuz and doesn't boot, ofonlyboot.img starts > >>loading a kernel and ends with the tux/red cross. Here again, only the ofonlyboot is ok, the boot.img is bad. You should try the daily builds too. floppy-2.4 should be ok, altough the 2.6 ones failed to build, but should be ok tomorrow. Friendly, Sven Luther