According to Luca Bigliardi, on Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:07:21 +0100, >On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:49 AM, Cedric Pradalier wrote: > >> I'd like to know if there is still people using this module, > >I've used it for a while: >http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2005/01/msg00453.html > >Now i'm living without thermal control. >The logic board of my ibook has been substituted two times, but i don't >know if this is somehow correlated with the lack of thermal control: >my laptop is in the "Repair Extension Program". >
I don't believe so, this is a general ibook problem which also happen to people using only OSX. A cheap HW design... >> if these users would like to see this module included an >> official kernel > >Yes, of course (but, IIRC, BenH didn't like degrees symbol). > I've made them a compile time parameter in latest version. I usually use the * symbol on my machine. >> if, knowing that lm_sensors should be able to read this >> chip, you still need the therm_adm103x module (I think so >> since I believe lm_sensor does not provide control over >> the chip, or does it?). > >So you can say that therm_adm103x is definitively better than lm_sensors? No, I've not managed to use lm_sensors :) I did not try very hard neither... I would really like to know if someone managed to use it, and if so, gives a comparative evaluation of both modules. -- Cedric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]