On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:34:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > The maintainer is held responsible (and frans and joeyh have not stepped > > down > > from reminding me of this in the past) of the build failure, while a > > contributor is free commit fixes, without necessarily being the one to blame > > for every problem of the port. > > And whereas when the alpha daily builds are broken and require build env > updates to get them working again I simply fix them at my earliest > opportunity, you invariably used this as an excuse to accuse the rest of the
I don't remember it such, i remember frans accusing me of negligence and misconduct because i did give a (maybe a bit uninformed) advice to a powerpc user. > d-i team of misconduct or negligence. Your technical skills and committment > to powerpc are valuable traits, but the only thing you bring to the table > that's irreplaceable is your penchant for vitriol, and I'm quite sure > everyone involved would be happy to be rid of that. I am most assuredly not the only one in debian with this trait, who will you get ride of next ? > It's unfortunate that even your resignation as d-i porter doesn't spare the > rest of the d-i team from having their time wasted by threads like this. Oh, thanks. so you also believe that the removal of my d-i commit rights was warranted. Could you please explain this in the open, and not in this cabal like fasion ? (22:36:45)< vorlon> fjp: can you speak to why svenl's commit access to d-i was revoked? I vaguely remember a clean-up of unused d-i accounts, but I thought that only covered accounts that had been unused for some time. (22:37:07)< fjp> vorlon: I'd prefer /msg So, why was i not informed of that fact ? And why is the powerpc port broken since 4 weeks without nobody noticing ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]