On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:33:19PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Yes. We could but it would add another package on archive while the > >> fix is a simple change on initramfs itself. I don't think it's a good > >> trade of. > > > > Well, the initramfs-tools is a hook based technology. We could add that > > hook > > to a package dependeded upon by the kernel or always installed in powerpc > > installs. Like mkvmlinuz for example. But yes, fixing it in initramfs-tools > > is > > nicer. Now that the d-i problem is solved, i will ping again maks, and maybe > > provide the d-i patch to him again, or send him a patch directly. > > Looks like the best way to get it done is to use your code of > fancontrol on rootskel to use register-module. What do you think? It > would solve the installed system load problem without touching > initramfs-tools. Do you think it's a better solution?
No the right thing is to fix initramfs-tools, fixing this in d-i will not work on upgrades. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]