Source: ghostscript Version: 9.16~dfsg-2.1 Severity: normal User: debian-sp...@lists.debian.org Usertags: sparc64
Hello! ghostscript currently fails to build from source on sparc64 due to a mismatched symbols file: dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libgs9/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libgs9.symbols --- debian/libgs9.symbols (libgs9_9.16~dfsg-2.1_sparc64) +++ dpkg-gensymbolsIeNygU 2016-02-04 01:22:29.643520921 +0000 @@ -3332,7 +3332,7 @@ gxht_thresh_planes@Base 9.05~ hc_put_code_proc@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 hc_put_last_bits_proc@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 - hdr_id@Base 9.10~dfsg +#MISSING: 9.16~dfsg-2.1# hdr_id@Base 9.10~dfsg height@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 ht_order_procs_table@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 #MISSING: 9.00~dfsg-1# iWrite2@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 @@ -4004,6 +4004,7 @@ pixel_image_params@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 pixmap_high_level_pattern@Base 9.10~dfsg plane_device_init@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 + png_push_fill_buffer@Base 9.16~dfsg-2.1 pop_estack@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 pprintd1@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 pprintd2@Base 8.61.dfsg.1 dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors The simple and obvious fix would be to mark the "hdr_id" symbol on sparc64 as missing which I have already done for the package in the 'unreleased' suite, (arch!=sparc64) hdr_id@Base 9.10~dfsg which works fine. However, I think it would be better to figure out first why this particular symbol is missing on sparc64 and whether this poses any problem. So far, the patched version seems to work without issues and we therefore might just go ahead and patch the symbols file as suggested, but it would be still be good if someone could have a deeper look at this. Maybe it's any of the (transitive) build dependencies of ghostscript which need to be rebuilt? Cheers, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913