Quoting Brian Potkin (2018-03-16 15:11:51) > On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 14:16:14 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > Quoting Brian Potkin (2018-03-16 13:09:31) > > > On Fri 16 Mar 2018 at 11:15:49 +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote: > > > > > > > Brother drivers seem to be GPL: https://tinyurl.com/y7e2bpws > > > > > > The licence includes the section: > > > > > > Further, Brother shall have no liability to disclose and/or distribute > > > the source code of the Software to User. In no case shall the above > > > license by Brother to modify, alter, translate or otherwise prepare > > > derivative works of the Software be construed as Brother's implied > > > agreement or undertakings to disclose and/or distribute the source code > > > of the Software. > > > > Thanks for noticing. Would you mind filing a bugreport against > > licensecheck to get it to detect that oddity? > > > > I might get around to implement it in any case, but a bigreport helps me > > not forget, and gives you the credit you deserve :-) > > I really wouldn't know how to effectively formulate a report for this > class of bug. So.....
I was thinking a bug of severity "wishlist", suggesting that licensecheck implemented detection of above quoted phrase in relation to detecting GPL, flagging that as non-GPL licensing. ...but a quick search at codesearch.debian.net (which is limited to line-based search!) for "shall have no liability to disclose" gives no hits, so maybe it is overkill for licensecheck to handle this peculiarity. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
