Control: severity -1 normal Hi Guilhem,
Quoting Guilhem Bonnefille (2021-04-25 20:52:16) > Package: ghostscript > Version: 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u4 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > > Initialy, I found the bug by updating from Debian stretch to buster > (10.9): the printer was working on stretch but no more on buster. The > device was running on armel. I did tests on i686 and it works. > > After investigation, I was able to identify the « smallest » error context. > The following command: > > gs -dPDFDEBUG -dPARANOIDSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dNOINTERPOLATE -dNOMEDIAATTRS > -dShowAcroForm -sstdout=%stderr -sOutputFile=%stdout -sDEVICE=jpeg > -sMediaType=Automatic -sOutputType=0 -r600x600 -dMediaPosition=7 > -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841 -dcupsMediaType=-1 > -dcupsBitsPerColor=8 -dcupsColorOrder=0 -dcupsColorSpace=17 -dcupsInteger0=26 > -scupsPageSizeName=A4 -I/usr/share/cups/fonts -c '<</.HWMargins[9.000000 > 9.000000 9.000000 9.000000] /Margins[0 0]>>setpagedevice' -f -_ < > /tmp/ades.cups-pdf >/dev/null > > Produces error messages on armel but not on i686: > > 8.33333 0 0 8.33333 0 0 cm > BT > **** Error reading a content stream. The page may be incomplete. > Output may be incorrect. > **** Error: Form stream has unbalanced q/Q operators (too many q's) > Output may be incorrect. > Q > Q > **** Error: File did not complete the page properly and may be damaged. > Output may be incorrect. > %Resolving: [1 0] > > The input is obtained from hp-setup print test page (PS) converted to > cups-pdf with cupsfilter, which certainly means that gs is not able to > read a PDF it generates. Thanks for the bugreport - the details provided is much appreciated! A key piece is missing, however: Please provide a sample file which - like you describe - succeeds to be processed by Ghostscript on i686 and armel/stretch but fails on armel/buster. Would also be helpful if you could check that same file can be succesfully parsed by other PostScript parsers - e.g. Evince, xpdf, and (if you have access to that) Adobe applications. I am lowering severity: That field reflects the package as a whole not the specific issue reported, and I don't consider this issue so severe that Debian would be better off without Ghostscript if it cannot be solved. Don't worry - it is common to mistake the scope of the severity field :-) Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
