On Jun 13, Miguel Wooding SF Ten.Union wrote: > I can only encourage you to add the functionality you need to one of > the free viewers. FWIW, everything that you can do with xv can be done with some combination of the GIMP and xzgv packages in woody. The only advantage to xv is that the visual schnauzer is probably more fun to use than the GIMP's file selector, which (in 1.1.22) only shows one preview at a time (xzgv has a nice visual selector, but it has virtually no image editing capability). Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- why not replace individual programs? David N. Welton
- Re: why not replace individual programs? Christian Surchi
- Re: why not replace individual progra... Goswin Brederlow
- Re: why not replace individual pr... Radovan Garabik
- Re: why not replace individua... Pablo Baena
- Re: why not replace indi... Brian Mays
- Re: why not replace ... Pablo Baena
- Re: why not repl... Steve Greenland
- Re: why not repl... Chris Pimlott
- Re: why not replace individual pr... Miguel Wooding SF Ten.Union
- Re: why not replace individua... Chris Lawrence
- Re: why not replace indi... Chris Pimlott
- Re: why not replace ... Steve Greenland
- Re: why not repl... Radovan Garabik
- Re: why not repl... Peter S Galbraith
- Re: why not repl... Radovan Garabik
- Re: why not repl... Peter S Galbraith
- Re: why not repl... David N. Welton
- Re: why not replace individua... Colin Watson
- Re: why not replace individual programs? truename