On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 01:49:00PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > > It has not only been asserted, but proven through the quote of DC 4.1.5. > that is your assertion. it also has not been proved. And conversely your assertion that Debian can't modify existing documents hasn't been proved. Since this is a matter of interpretation, I hope we'll all accept the secretary's interpretation when he makes it known? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and working code.'' -- Dave Clark
- Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-fr... Bolan Meek
- Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CF... Craig Sanders
- Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re... Bolan Meek
- Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (wa... Craig Sanders
- Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues... Anthony Towns
- Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary I... Craig Sanders
- Re: Constitutional, Parliamenta... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: Constitutional, Parliam... Julian Gilbey
- Re: Constitutional, Parliam... Craig Sanders
- Re: Constitutional, Parliam... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: Constitutional, Parliam... William Ono
- Re: Constitutional, Parliam... Michael Bramer
- Re: Constitutional, Parliam... Jules Bean
- Re: Constitutional, Parliam... Clay Crouch
- Foundational Document Prote... Bolan Meek