On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:36:57AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote: > If we just use "Open Source", we don't make this less ambiguous. There are > "Open Source" licenses which are "you can see but you can't touch". > > Free Software is the movement that has generated a community, we should try > to explain what "free" means instead of using other vage terms. OK, I apologise for the confusion. Please read "free software" (as in DFSG) when reading my post. Thanks, Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Hamish Moffatt
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Steve Greenland
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marek Habersack
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Dirk Eddelbuettel
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Anthony Towns
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Hamish Moffatt
- Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Jordi Mallach
- Hamish Moffatt