On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 09:15:22PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Despite being ACCEPTed, this package failed the database sanity checks > > at the time of install. This should only happen rarely and in > > corner-cases (a binary upload of a package which has since been > > melanie'd for example), so no code to do the necessary unaccept > > actions has been written. These actions (e.g. bug reopening, > > announcement rescinding, etc.) will have to be done by hand. Also, > > the files have been left in the accepted directory; please deal with > > them as well. > > > I receive a message like this every day now, and I'm still waiting for > > somebody to tell me how do I "deal with them". > > The files in question are not in NEW; I'm pretty sure this corresponds to > the UNACCEPTED state, which means the packages were accepted by katie and > then something broke afterwards.
Yes, I know, but it's a very similar case: once the files disappear from the queue, you don't seem to have control over them anymore. I wonder why this message ask me to deal with them if I can't. > Please check with the ftpmasters on how to fix this. I contacted them the very first day this happened. No reply so far. That's why I asked here. If you or anybody else knows how to "deal with them", I would be very interested to know. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]