On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:51:58PM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 12:47]: > > Perhaps you're right. I honestly hadn't considered an etch virtual > > package. My goal has been to automate the process as much as > > possible, with certain ideas that extend beyond what debbugs > > currently provides. I suppose I could hack on debbugs itself to > > provide those features, but from what I understand it's an > > incredibly difficult codebase to work with. Then again, if debbugs > > is sufficient then there's no need for me to do duplicate work, > > which would be nice. > > Bugzilla has the concept of a bug depending on another bug (or bugs) > which is commonly used to track release issues and progress. I think > they also have nice visualization tools to show the dependency tree.
Thanks Martin! I'll have a look. Hmpf. At the rate I'm going, maybe I should just look in to writing debbugs-next-generation. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]