On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:43:13PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Daniel Ruoso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On the other side, d-d-a is a list which has a very low traffic, and > > certainly almost every developer see the posts in d-d-a, but... not > > every email that intends to reach all developers is appropriate to d-d-a > > since it's not allways an announce. > > > > So, thinking about all of this, I have a question... > > > > Isn't a public mailing list (with public logs), but moderated to > > @debian.org posters, a possible solution to the current misuse of > > debian-private? > > No, that's d-d-a, just get around the name issue (ie: ignore it/get over > it/whatever) and use it, just don't abuse it. >
But there's arguably a lot of non-developers subscribed to d-d-a as well... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]