It is clear that Debian will have to change in order to face the issues it is confronted with, and I think the Vancouver proposal is a good starting point. It might need some fine-tuning, but I believe everybody is aware of that by now, so just screaming at the original proposal will not buy us anything.
That's true that we have problems, but I am sure they do not come from the number of architectures. The proposal has no rational behind each point, so it don't explain me how it would solve the problems we have.
- Stop the "Project Scud", the cabal is already enough!
There is no Cabal.
Is it a joke?
Aurelien
-- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
