On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:55:03PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Darren O. Benham wrote: > > For the official record, as Debian Project Secretary, I have not received a > > formal proposal and the only message I read on debian-project (I thought) > > said "draft". > > He said he had planned to post it as a draft but he was worried about time > constraints. I got the impression he ment it to be a proposal. >
It wasn't posted on -vote where proposals go. If I have to parse -devel (and now -project where most of the volume is SUPPOSED to go), I can very easily miss proposals. That's one of the reasons -vote was created, for proposals.... So, for the official record, Debian Project Secretary hasn't received a formal proposal... - Debian Project Secretary P.S. I know this one is coming and I can prepare for it but during the logo thing I had actually missed a proposed logo (which had enough seconds, I believe) because it was proposed to -devel. I want to be sure something like that doesn't happen again and so I'm going to be a little anal about having it go to either -vote or [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd prever -vote because the first thing I'll do is use Mutt's bounce feature to send it there ;) -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * =========================================================================
pgp0lPJ9CXIZz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
