On Nov 19, Raul Miller wrote: > Are we talking about wedging Debian software into a FreeBSD system, or > are we talking about making the FreeBSD kernel available to Debian users.
I think we're talking about making Debian run without Linux emulation under the FreeBSD kernel. I guess the purpose is to make the equivalent of a "FreeBSD distribution," even though there is no such beast (there's FreeBSD, but it's not a "FreeBSD distribution" in the sense that Red Hat and Debian are "Linux distributions", since it's all one big happy package). > If the former, why even bother calling it debian? Or are we expecting > FreeBSD to start following debian policy. My suspicion is that we're creating FreeBSD-native packages that will follow Debian policy, running under the FreeBSD kernel. Chris -- ============================================================================= | Chris Lawrence | Visit my home page! | | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.lordsutch.com/chris/ | | | | | Open Directory Editor | Visit the Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5: | | http://dmoz.org/ | <*> http://www.midwinter.com/lurk/ <*> | =============================================================================