On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 22:48, Daniel Stone wrote: > #iamacow and, later, OFTC. (Luckily, OFTC has so far mostly avoid > becoming another lilofree.net).
You know that argument about lilofree.net is a total sham. I *know* the people who run lilofree and their 'deal'. lilofree is more about a specific person who has a certain need to socially engineer everything for bad. He has a following (not including myself) who thinks that the OPN staff took a paticularly harsh action to this sort of activity. They created another network because too many of them didn't want to not-be-around this single person. Calling it a network, comparing it to the aims of OFTC, and throwing it into some of the arguments is a great way to show off your want to muddle the issues via emotions rather than facts. -- Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/