> To get feedback, I'm running a poll on debianHELP. Debian.Org's > position on non-free software is pretty clear (in spite of the fact that > non-free software is still distributed by Debian), but I wanted to solicit
If Debian's position on non-free software was clear to you, you would not be saying "in spite of the fact". Our position is outlined in our social contract. Personally, I don't think we should spread the support of non-free. We abide by our social contract to allow it a place in our archive, and I think that's far enough. Anything extra should be saved for free software. IOW, I think that debianHELP.org announcing non-free software is not a good idea. Be sure to not confuse commercial with non-free. Qt is commericial, but is still free. -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/