What's wrong with our mail system? Why can't the debian admins blacklist a well known spammer, or even better use a reputable DNSBL like SBL? I asked the same questions to the debian admins but nobody ever replied, I'm sick of receiving every few days the same spam from the same professional spammer which could be trivially filtered.
http://spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL5935 http://spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL7393 ----- Forwarded message from Julie Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from attila.bofh.it (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonderland.l___x.it (Postfix/Md) with ESMTP id 3C30014083 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:31:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [3ffe:8171:10:1::1]) by attila.bofh.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA6F5F776 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [::ffff:146.82.138.7]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0A74247 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:19:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from (localhost.localdomain) [218.246.33.40] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 19AZhN-00006Q-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:19:25 -0500 Received: from () by (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h3TFa25O020018 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 02:17:43 +0800 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 02:14:00 +0800 (CST) From: Julie Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Julie Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian.seabone.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=2076211710.1051640040109.JavaMail.SYSTEM.emaserver2 X-EMA-CID: 16725225 X-EMA-LID: X-EMA-PC: 0f4d99edee300 X-Bogosity: Yes, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=1.000000, version=0.11.2 ----- End forwarded message ----- -- ciao, | Marco | [696 imj/F.yqXh2Ag]
