On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 04:02:50PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:29:58AM -0700, Kevin Rosenberg wrote: > > Michael Banck wrote: > > > once non-free is removed from debian.org. In fact, we might try to get > > > non-free.org running even no matter what the outcome of the general > > > resolution will be, provided maintainers are interested in moving their > > > packages there. > > > > One of the advantages of keeping non-free on the Debian servers is to > > avoid such a duplication of effort. If results of the current vote > > reaffirms support for non-free, why would maintainers want to work on > > such duplication and move packages to the parallel system? > > You'd have to ask people actually maintaing non-free packages here. From > the discussions on -vote, I was under this impression.
Wow, really? -vote is too much noise for me, but I definitely wouldn't see any reason to move my couple of non-free packages away from debian.org if the vote goes that way. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]