On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:03:42AM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:38:31AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > >>On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:06:32PM -0800, Jonathan Walther wrote: > >>To the contrary, it is equalitarians that treat people inhumanely; > >>expecting too much of some, and denigrating the abilities of others. Do > >>you expect a man to bear children? Why do you expect women to accept > >>the same treatment that men give to each other, when they are the ones > >>who bear the seed of our future generations during it's most vulnerable > >>state? > > > >This is hopeless nonsense, and clearly comes from someone who has never had > >to face prejudice themselves. > > Let me guess, you also believe in fairy tales such as the one that the > earth is over-populated, and that infants in the womb are neither human > nor essential to our future?
I don't see the point of your ongoing uterine fixation in this discussion. It doesn't seem to support your argument. "Women bear children, and men do not, and therefore I am paying them a favour in treating them as intellectually and physically inferior based on their sex. QED."? > You seem to be the inexperienced one; you've never had to comfort a > grieving mother who had a miscarriage after experiencing a level of stress > and physical activity that would have bothered no man. As if on cue, you've gone from speaking for all women to speaking for all men. -- - mdz