-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "JR" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Me> Supporting non-free and contrib also complicates all our tools Me> and confuses people as to what "Debian" is. JR> Neither of which is as tangible as the amount of effort JR> necessary to switch, so you have to understand that there are JR> people who simply disagree with your assessments. Of course! We wouldn't be having a vote if this were self-evident. Me> I'm just asking that you don't use Debian machines and Me> infrastructure to do your non-Debian projects. JR> You've used a debatable definition of "non-Debian JR> projects". "non-free software isn't a part of Debian". But, yes, I was being purposefully provocative in order to reframe the question as: non-free is a non-Debian project that we've hosted and supported for years. We're just revisiting whether we'll continue doing that. ~ESP - -- Evan Prodromou [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAV21pozwefHAKBVERAkRMAKDUpi638bIofNxlycZZqAry/oogSwCcDpDp G11NxjBWu/Uz4qn/FLQMbaE= =iA47 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----