On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:23:58PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi, > > Am So, den 28.03.2004 schrieb Michael Banck um 16:41: > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 04:06:21PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I dunno. We *want* -devel-announce to be read be every DD, even the ones > > which are almost-MIA, in the hope that they'd react to urgent stuff. If > > there'll be a lot more of infrastructural messages (which I fully > > approve of per se) on -devel-announce, some of them might feel annoyed > > by them (if they're almost-MIA, they're probably not interested whether > > the BTS moves from master to spohr or whatever) and unsubscribe from > > -devel-announce. Thus I'd rather see an -infrastructure list (but that > > is partly due to the fact that I'm not subscribed to -devel right now). > > I think that almost-MIAs that would unsubscribe because of these kind of > messages would have done so already, considering the weekly automatic > bug reports. Or do you expect the infrastructional messages to be more > frequent than maybe one per week?
You can easily procmail those auto-generated messages away, and they have been around for years. But anyway, I don't have a strong opinion on this. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html