MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-07-10 19:25:38 +0100 Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >What about the LPI certificates? They have an rpm and deb part, so
> >you can choose and they are generally distribution-agnostic.
>
> What about them indeed? Have they published full examination
> statistics yet, or only small summaries and assurances of "extensive
> validation"? It's been a few months since I looked, so they might have
> finally done this basic act.
What about asking LPI?
Regards,
Joey
--
Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect.
