Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:53:45PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> You're seriously suggesting that Debian wouldn't be laughed out of the >> park for releasing without Mozilla at the moment? If you aren't >> suggesting this, then that comment is irrelevant. > >Branden reminded me on IRC that the discussion is about the MPL, not >about the Mozilla browser, which is triple-licensed under MPL/GPL/LGPL. >My apologies for my confusion.
Most of Mozilla is triple-licensed I believe that some remains dual-licensed under the MPL/NPL, and so deciding that the MPL is non-free certainly means that we can't ship Mozilla. http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html certainly implies that some work remains to be done there. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
