Selon Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It is fact, not evidence. You cannot conclude it comes from discrimination. > > You can't conclude it doesn't, either. We have several women on this list
I don't conclude anything because I can't get any evidence, and I'd like to hear them from you. > who are saying that they want to get involved in Debian, but for various > reasons they don't feel comfortable doing so. Which are? Please post them here. If there are such problems in Debian, bringing them on ghetto'ed lists won't improve anything. > > What if women don't want to spend their spare time in computing > > activities? > > Do you *really* think that's the case? I knew several women at University I do think nothing, this is hypothetical. > who were quite keen to spend their leisure time in computing activities, > we've got several women on this list, and I can't think of any intrinsic > reason why women would not get involved in computing activities in their > spare time. Can you? Me neither. But again, I cannot conclude it is discrimination. > > > > Just because it doesn't say "no wheelchairs" at the door, doesn't mean > those > > > stairs aren't going to be a pain in the arse to get up. > > > > You *still* haven't come with evidence. For example, you could point us > > to where in the NM process there is discrimination (of course, not about > the > > silly he/she wordings war). > > There have been several places in which issues have been identified in the > NM process, by the people affected by it -- issues of not having any "feel" > for what really, actually goes on (hence Frank Lichtenheld's recent > description of his entry into Debian), and documentation which could be > clearer. Is that a good enough start? Not it is not. It is not about discrimination, it is about political correctness in documentation written in English. -- Jérôme Marant