On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 00:21:07 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> Nobody has proposed censoring Andrew. People are simply stating
>> that they will stop listening to him. Would you deny them that
>> freedom?
> Do that quitely, then. A public motion to killfile someone is a
> public statement, and that's how it should be taken. Drop the "deny
> them that freedom" rhetoric.
Err. I reserve the right to *plonk* people, if you think they
have the right to speak their minds. Since when has the right to my
attention been a freedom other people enjoy? And if I wish to share
my kill file details with the public, why is it OK to censor _me_,
and deny me the freedom of so sharing my killfile?
manoj
--
I don't deserve this award, but I have arthritis and I don't deserve
that either. -- Jack Benny
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
