Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] There are some people for whom > things will not be resolved in acceptable ways.
When I'm not part of DUS and don't have to allow DUS to hold my personal details, it's resolved for me. I'm surprised if that's unacceptable to anyone. There's a shed-load of other stuff that would be nice to see, but not enough for me to act on. > > It's worthwhile to attempt to convince Debian at large to become a > > commercial entity. This didn't seem terribly likely to happen when I > > brought it up last but perhaps it's time for another go at it. > When it comes to the technical side of things, policy follows practice. So why flout previous policy? Presumably there's some past practice which caused it, even if it's just writing. If you really believe no-one objects, make the change first. Debian policy is not just post-event rationalisation of DD actions. -- MJ Ray (slef) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]