On Monday 17 October 2005 13:22, Ian Jackson wrote: | PS: Don's message that I quote above was posted to debian-private but ... | The alternative, to paraphrase Don's words, seems silly.
That sounds like you can't draw a straight line, Ian. What's wrong with "Stick to what you agreed to." ? If a proprietary part of the 'Debian something' 's code has a remote exploit, will "Debian" sound less attractive ? So how about "Anyone who knowingly exploits someone else's trademark, without bothering to ask them for permission first, is a thief." ? Can anyone afford to entrust their enterprise's computer security to the Common Thief Consortium ? I'm glad that you advocate a firmer approach, Ian. have fun ! Siward de Groot (home.wanadoo.nl/siward) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
