Andreas Barth wrote: > Though of course some delegates of the DPL could influence who could > vote in that GR (not that I assume that the current ones would do that, > but this seems to be a flaw that the constitution doesn't regulate at > all how people can become and loose developer status).
Hm. Interesting point. Good point. This is a Constitutional buffer-overflow vulnerability, isn't it? Seconded. It's hard to imagine Joerg overflowing the buffer, as it were; but like any security flaw, we probably should patch this when we have some time. -- Thaddeus H. Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
