Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mutt has a configuration var somewhere to tell it whether to CC or not > by default on list followups. I have it set not to, and I have to add > the CC manually if I want it. I'm sure Mutt is capable enough that it's > possible to bind a key to "enable CC, start list followup, revert CC" > or something, but I'm not inclined to spend that much time bending over > backwards to implement other people's preferences, when there's a well- > known way for them to make it happen automatically.
I am using Gnus. I have it setup to send followups to the list only. When I do a followup it goes to the list, a reply goes to the sender and a "very wide reply" goes to both. I wonder what the group-reply command in mutt does. > > I'm also failing to see any reasons people would *not* set M-F-T if they > want CCs (or if they specifically don't; Debian lists aside, most other > lists have no such policy). I'm not charged for email on a per-header > basis; there's no drawback to setting it. A simple reason could be that it is not supported by their MUA. > > The fact that it's "not a formal standard" isn't interesting to me; it'd > be nice if it was, but that's all. I agree that it would be nice. But, due to the fact that it is not a formal standard you can not expect everybody's MUA to support it. This should not prevent you from promoting MFT. ;-) Only until it is a standard it is not an universal solution. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]