Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Now, if there are people like that who are not DD's, the > question we must ask, is wjy are they not DD's? If they are putting > in the work, and have the same commitment as a DD does, even if they > do not package stuff, why is the project not treating them as first > class members?
"The Debian New Maintainer process is a series of required proceedings to become a Debian Developer." -- http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint How can someone who is not a package maintainer become a developer, if becoming a developer requires being a maintainer? Or is the above statement false? It seems to disagree with the constitution section 3.2.1 "Developers are volunteers who agree to further the aims of the Project insofar as they participate in it, and who maintain package(s) for the Project or do other work ^^ which the Project Leader's Delegate(s) consider worthwhile"? -- http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/constitution Are there other delegates beside the NM ones admitting DDs? Or something else? Confusedly, -- MJR/slef Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
