On Sunday 14 May 2006 12:23, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 04:31:16PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Saturday 13 May 2006 16:03, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > Re: Paul Johnson 2006-05-14 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > Why does it necessarily have to be IRC? Jabber fixes a lot of IRC's > > > > shortcomings, without bringing along all the political drama and > > > > baggage OFTC, Freenode, and every other IRC network in existence. > > > > Switching to another IRC network just sets things up to repeat and > > > > have this discussion again in another few years. > > > > > > If you don't care about IRC, why don't you just let us choose the > > > network we prefer? > > > > Debian seeks the free choice, right? Jabber is free-er. > > Are you trying to say we should have a jabber.debian.org?
Yes. > We already > seem to have a jabber.debian.net, pointing at hades.robster.org. Doesn't count, it's unresponsive. Try browsing to it on Jabber. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber
pgpUwwX9C1hwl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
