On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:57:32PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:23:09PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > So, that's a clear example where the team maintenance can be as useless > as letting only one people maintaining a package.
So what? The apache team may be one example of team not working well, but I'm pretty sure we can find tens of examples of teams working well. The real point is whether people moved from individual to collaborative maintenance found a better working environment and if the resulting quality of packages has increased or not. For the former aspect a poll among DDs would be enough to tell, for the latter my feeling and experiences tell yes, but it's hard to check. Note that if only the former aspect is true, and if at worst the package quality did not improve (as in the apache case) it may still be worth massively moving to collaborative maintenance. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
